Indira Gandhi and the Indian Police: How the Emergency Marked the Collapse of Police Integrity
The Indian police system, though born during British colonial rule, maintained a certain institutional discipline and fear-based respect well into the early decades of independent India. However, by the 1970s, this integrity began to erode rapidly. A pivotal factor in this decline was the rule of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, particularly during the Emergency period from 1975 to 1977. Her use of state machinery, especially the police, to consolidate power marked a dangerous turning point in India’s democratic journey. This article explores how Indira Gandhi’s era damaged the integrity of the Indian police and left a legacy of political interference that persists to this day.
Colonial Legacy and Early Discipline
The Indian police system was designed under the Indian Police Act of 1861, introduced by the British Raj after the 1857 revolt. Its purpose was clear: to enforce colonial authority, not to serve the public. The police were structured hierarchically and operated under strict administrative control, ensuring discipline and compliance. While it was not a people-friendly system, it was at least orderly, and police officers were largely insulated from local political interference.
After independence in 1947, the newly sovereign Indian state inherited this colonial model. Despite its flaws, the system initially retained a measure of effectiveness and integrity. The Indian Civil Services (later the Indian Administrative Service and Indian Police Service) attracted some of the best minds in the country. Officers worked with a sense of national purpose during the Nehruvian era, and while corruption existed, it was not systemic. The first two decades of independence saw relative institutional discipline in the police force.
Indira Gandhi’s Rise and the Centralization of Power
Indira Gandhi became Prime Minister in 1966. While initially seen as a political lightweight, she quickly consolidated power within the Congress Party and the government. Her leadership style evolved into a highly centralized and authoritarian form, where loyalty to her personally became more important than institutional integrity or democratic norms.
One of the most damaging aspects of her rule was her increasing reliance on the police and intelligence agencies to suppress dissent and tighten her grip on power. This laid the groundwork for what would culminate in the Emergency of 1975–77, a period during which India’s democratic institutions, including the police, were systematically subverted.
The Emergency: A Dark Chapter in Indian Democracy
On June 25, 1975, Indira Gandhi declared a national Emergency, citing “internal disturbance.” This move came shortly after the Allahabad High Court had declared her 1971 election to the Lok Sabha invalid due to electoral malpractice. Instead of stepping down, she suspended civil liberties, censored the press, and ruled by decree.
The police were transformed overnight into tools of political oppression. Here’s how:
1. Mass Arrests and Suppression of Dissent
Thousands of opposition leaders, activists, journalists, and students were arrested without warrants under laws like the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA). Police followed the instructions of political superiors, disregarding legal processes and human rights. Courts were rendered powerless as habeas corpus rights were suspended.
2. Forced Sterilization Drives
Under the influence of Sanjay Gandhi, the Emergency period also saw the launch of coercive sterilization campaigns in the name of population control. Police were instructed to help round up poor men, especially from vulnerable communities like Dalits and Muslims. Entire slums were targeted, and sterilization was often conducted under duress or by force, leading to widespread trauma.
3. Media Censorship and Surveillance
Police enforced strict media censorship and carried out surveillance on anyone suspected of opposing the regime. The Special Branch and Intelligence Bureau became extensions of the Prime Minister’s office, not institutions of national security but of political espionage.
The Structural Damage to the Police System
The Emergency normalized the use of police for political ends. Indira Gandhi made it clear that loyalty to the ruling party was more important than upholding the law. This destroyed the notion of police independence.
Key structural impacts included:
- Transfers and promotions became politicized. Officers who obeyed political commands were rewarded, while honest officers were marginalized or punished.
- Fear-based obedience replaced professional accountability. The chain of command was increasingly dictated by politicians rather than senior officers or rule of law.
- The morale of upright officers deteriorated. Many IPS officers who opposed illegal directives were humiliated, sidelined, or transferred to insignificant postings.
The Legacy of the Emergency
Even though the Emergency officially ended in March 1977 and Indira Gandhi was voted out of office, the damage done to Indian institutions—including the police—was long-lasting. When she returned to power in 1980, the changes she had institutionalized remained. The belief that police are not guardians of law, but tools of power, became entrenched in Indian politics.
Future governments, including those from other parties, adopted similar practices:
- Using police to target opposition leaders.
- Engaging in fake encounters or custodial torture.
- Politically driven appointments and transfers.
The erosion of police integrity thus became a systemic issue, with the Emergency serving as its inflection point.
Was Indira Gandhi Alone to Blame?
While Indira Gandhi was certainly the single most significant figure responsible for the institutional degradation of the Indian police, she was not alone in perpetuating the decline. Later politicians across party lines—regional satraps, caste-based parties, and even technocratic governments—failed to implement meaningful reforms. The National Police Commission’s recommendations from the 1970s onwards were largely ignored.
The Supreme Court’s directives in the Prakash Singh vs. Union of India case (2006), which sought to insulate police from political interference, also remain mostly unimplemented by states. So while Indira Gandhi broke the backbone, others allowed the system to stay broken.
Conclusion: A Legacy That Demands Reversal
The Indian police force today still carries the scars of Indira Gandhi’s authoritarian rule. The Emergency period was not merely a temporary suspension of democracy; it was a deep institutional wound that redefined the relationship between the police, politics, and the public.
Restoring police integrity in India will require:
- Implementing long-pending police reforms.
- Establishing independent oversight bodies.
- Ensuring fixed tenures and merit-based promotions.
- Replacing the colonial-era Police Act of 1861 with a modern, democratic framework.
Indira Gandhi’s rule serves as a stark reminder of how easily democratic institutions can be hijacked when political power goes unchecked. The challenge now lies in reversing that legacy before the idea of impartial and just policing fades permanently from Indian democracy.
Comments are closed.