Why India Resists U.S. Entry into Its Agriculture and Dairy Sectors?

India and the United States share a complex, evolving trade relationship, marked by cooperation in technology, defense, and services, but also marred by persistent friction in sectors like agriculture and dairy. Among the key sticking points in trade negotiations is India’s continued reluctance to open its agriculture and dairy markets to American companies. While the U.S. has been pressing for greater access to these sectors under various trade frameworks, India has resisted firmly — and with good reason.

This resistance stems not from economic protectionism alone, but from a deeper matrix of social, cultural, ethical, and political concerns. From safeguarding the livelihood of millions of farmers to protecting religious beliefs regarding cows and vegetarianism, India’s stand on the issue is informed by its unique civilizational context.

The Backbone of India: Small Farmers

India is an agricultural country not only in economic terms but in its very social fabric. While the contribution of agriculture to India’s GDP has declined over the decades — now around 15–18% — it still supports over 50% of the population. Importantly, 85% of Indian farmers are small or marginal, owning less than 2 hectares of land. These farmers operate on tight margins, lack irrigation, and are vulnerable to weather conditions, price volatility, and market shocks.

Allowing the entry of large-scale, heavily subsidized U.S. agri-produce into Indian markets would be economically devastating. American farmers benefit from billions of dollars in annual government subsidies, enjoy world-class logistics, and use high-input, industrial-scale farming techniques. Indian farmers cannot compete with such might.

Opening the Indian agricultural market would flood the system with cheap American grains, pulses, and processed foods — causing local prices to crash and destroying millions of rural livelihoods. This isn’t just a theoretical concern — similar patterns have been observed in other developing countries like Mexico after it opened its agriculture sector under NAFTA.

A Matter of Food Security and Sovereignty

India’s agricultural policies are designed with a heavy emphasis on food security. Programs like the Public Distribution System (PDS) and buffer stock management ensure that food grains are available at subsidized prices to the poor. The government procures large quantities of rice and wheat from Indian farmers at a Minimum Support Price (MSP) to maintain this balance.

Opening the gates to international agri-products, especially subsidized ones from developed economies, would severely undermine this model. It could erode the price discovery mechanism, undercut the MSP, and destabilize the entire food supply chain that serves hundreds of millions.

Moreover, food in India is not just a commodity — it is linked to cultural traditions, regional identities, and religious customs. Disruptions in local agricultural patterns can also lead to long-term erosion of traditional farming practices and biodiversity.

The Cultural Wall: Why U.S. Dairy Is Unacceptable to India

When it comes to dairy, India is the largest producer and consumer of milk in the world. It also has a highly decentralized dairy economy with over 75 million rural households involved in dairy production. The Indian dairy model — rooted in the White Revolution initiated by Dr. Verghese Kurien — relies heavily on cooperative societies, small farmers, and local breeds.

The U.S., in contrast, runs a factory-farming dairy model, dominated by large corporations and mechanized processes. But beyond economics and scale, there is a more sensitive and deep-seated issue that forms an unbreachable barrier between Indian and U.S. dairy trade: the feed given to American cows.

Non-Vegetarian Feed: A Religious Red Line

In the United States, it is common for dairy cows to be fed animal by-products such as:

  • Blood meal
  • Bone meal
  • Meat and bone residues
  • Tallow or fat derived from slaughtered animals

These practices are considered standard in Western industrial farming, aimed at boosting protein intake and maximizing milk yield. However, in India, such feeding practices are viewed as deeply offensive and unacceptable, particularly to communities that revere the cow as sacred.

For Hindus, Jains, and many vegetarians in India, consuming milk from cows that have been fed non-vegetarian matter is not only unethical — it is impure and spiritually polluting. Milk, in Indian tradition, is considered satvik — pure, nourishing, and life-giving. It is used in religious rituals, temple offerings, and even Ayurvedic medicine. The idea that this milk could originate from a cow that has consumed meat or blood goes against thousands of years of religious belief and practice.

Thus, India has refused to allow U.S. dairy imports unless the U.S. certifies that the milk is sourced from vegetarian-fed cows. Predictably, American exporters and government negotiators have rejected this demand, calling it an unfair non-tariff barrier. But for India, this is not negotiable — it is a civilizational red line.

Public Backlash and Political Fallout

Any move by an Indian government to open up the agriculture or dairy sector to U.S. competition could lead to massive protests, especially from:

  • Farmers’ unions
  • Dairy cooperatives
  • Religious groups
  • Opposition political parties

Agrarian protests have already rocked the country in recent years, as seen in the 2020–21 farmers’ agitation against farm laws. Even the mere possibility of foreign intrusion into these sectors would be seen as an existential threat by millions. For a country where elections are often won or lost on rural issues, no political party wants to be perceived as “selling out” the farmers or disrespecting cows.

Thus, restricting U.S. access becomes a matter of political survival, not just policy choice.

No Level Playing Field: The Subsidy War

The U.S. has historically accused India of protecting its agriculture through tariffs and subsidies. But this claim is misleading. While India does provide some subsidies, especially under the National Food Security Act and fertilizer programs, they pale in comparison to the subsidies given in the U.S. and EU.

According to estimates, the U.S. gives over $30 billion annually in direct and indirect support to its farmers. This includes price support, crop insurance, and income compensation. Indian farmers, in contrast, often struggle for timely payments, irrigation access, and insurance coverage. Hence, letting in U.S. imports without safeguards would mean unleashing a David vs Goliath battle, where millions of Indian Davids would lose.

Reciprocity Matters

India also points to the lack of reciprocal access. While the U.S. wants India to open its markets, it maintains strict sanitary and phytosanitary standards that have kept many Indian agri-products like mangoes, basmati rice, and spices out of the American market. Indian negotiators argue: why should we open our markets when we don’t get fair treatment in return?

This lack of parity adds another layer of complexity and mistrust to the trade discussions.

Sovereignty and Strategic Autonomy

At its core, India’s refusal to let foreign powers dictate terms in its most sensitive sectors is a statement of economic sovereignty. Agriculture and food are not just commercial sectors — they are the bedrock of national security. During the COVID-19 pandemic and global supply chain crises, India’s food self-sufficiency became a matter of pride and necessity. Any dependence on foreign suppliers for basic food or dairy would erode that autonomy.

India also views its dairy sector as a strategic success story — homegrown, self-reliant, and community-driven. Handing it over to multinational corporations goes against the vision of Atmanirbhar Bharat (self-reliant India).

Conclusion: Not Just Trade, It’s Identity

India’s firm stance against allowing the U.S. entry into its agriculture and dairy sectors is not a case of outdated protectionism. It is a holistic response to a complex reality — one that balances economic concerns, religious values, cultural ethics, and political stability.

  • Opening up agriculture threatens the livelihoods of hundreds of millions of small farmers.
  • Allowing U.S. dairy imports violates deeply held religious and moral values due to the non-vegetarian feed given to American cows.
  • The trade-off is not merely about prices and profits — it’s about preserving a way of life, a belief system, and the dignity of rural India.

Until the U.S. acknowledges these cultural and economic asymmetries — and offers respectful reciprocity — India is unlikely to budge. In the world’s largest democracy, food, faith, and farmers remain sacred. No trade deal, however tempting, can compromise that.

Comments are closed.