India witnessed one of its darkest periods of internal security during the UPA regime (2004–2014), as a relentless wave of Pakistan-based terrorism claimed hundreds of innocent lives. Despite irrefutable evidence linking these attacks to Pakistani terror groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami (HuJI), and the Indian Mujahideen (IM) with Pakistani handlers, the response from the government remained tepid, diplomatic, and often misguided.

Meanwhile, critics who question the Modi government’s track record on terrorism tend to overlook this decade of bloodshed. Under Prime Minister Modi’s leadership, India’s posture shifted from a soft target to an assertive state capable of punishing cross-border aggression. This makes current criticism not only misinformed but also hypocritical when viewed in historical context.

---

Pakistan-Based or Pakistan-Linked Terror Attacks During UPA (2004–2014)

#	Year	Attack	Location	Deaths	Group/Link
1	2004	Ghatkopar Bomb Blast	Mumbai	2	LeT suspected
2	2005	Delhi Diwali Blasts	Sarojini Nagar, etc.	62+	LeT, ISI suspected
3	2006	Varanasi Bombing	Sankat Mochan Temple, Cantt	28+	LeT
4	2006	Mumbai Local Train Blasts	7 blasts	209	ISI, LeT, SIMI
5	2006	Malegaon Blasts (Sept)	Maharashtra	37	HuJI (Pak link)
6	2007	Samjhauta Express Blast	Haryana	68 (mostly Pakistanis)	Initially LeT; later blamed on Hindu groups controversially
7	2007	Hyderabad Mecca Masjid	Mosque	14	HuJI (Pakistan-trained)
8	2007	Hyderabad Lumbini Park & Gokul Chat	Twin blasts	42	IM, Pak support
9	2007	Ajmer Sharif Dargah Blast	Ajmer	3	IM & HuJI (ISI link)
10	2008	Jaipur Serial Blasts	Rajasthan	63	IM, LeT link
11	2008	Bangalore Bombings	Near tech hubs	1	IM with Pakistan support
12	2008	Ahmedabad Serial Blasts	Hospitals, markets	56	IM, ISI handlers
13	2008	Delhi Blasts (Sep)	CP, Karol Bagh, etc.	30	IM & LeT
14	2008	26/11 Mumbai Attacks	Mumbai	166	LeT, ISI directed from Pakistan
15	2009	Pune Camp Area Blast	Bakery area	2	IM, cross-border links suspected
16	2010	Pune German Bakery Blast	Koregaon Park	17	IM with Pak training
17	2010	Varanasi Sheetla Ghat Bomb	Ganga aarti crowd	2 (incl. infant)	IM, Pak-linked
18	2011	Delhi High Court Blast	Gate No. 5	15	HuJI, Pak email claim
19	2011	Mumbai Triple Bombings	Opera House, Zaveri Bazaar, Dadar	26	IM with Pak support
20	2012	Pune Jangli Maharaj Road Blasts	Low-intensity	0	IM, Pak link suspected
21	2013	Hyderabad Dilsukhnagar Blasts	Crowded market	18	IM, Pak handler Riyaz Bhatkal
22	2013	Bangalore Mall Bombing	Near BJP office	16 injured	IM, Pakistan-based training
23	2013	Bodh Gaya Bombings	Buddhist shrine	0 (minor injuries)	IM, alleged Pak connection
24	2014	Chennai Central Train Bomb Blast	Train coach	1	IM sleeper cell, Pak training suspected
25	2014	Patna Rally Blasts (Modi’s rally)	Gandhi Maidan	6	IM, Pak-backed ideology

Total Civilian Deaths: Over 867

---

Modi vs UPA: The Stark Contrast on Terror Response

While India bled during UPA’s term, the Modi government redefined the nation’s counter-terrorism strategy through visible retaliation, narrative control, and international isolation of Pakistan.

Comparative Analysis:

Aspect	UPA (2004–2014)	Modi Govt (2014–Present)
Major Pakistan-Based Attacks	25+	9
Civilian Deaths	867	Less than 100 (cross-border-linked)
Post-Attack Response	Diplomatic pleas, dossiers, UN appeals	Surgical Strike (2016), Balakot Airstrike (2019) , Operation Sindoor (2025)
Message to Pakistan	Soft power, back-channel talks	Direct retaliation, global exposure
Narrative Control	Blame on “Hindu terror”, denied Pak role early on	Clear messaging against ISI/LeT
Terror Deterrence	Weak	High (no major Pak-based strike since 2019)
Border Security	Reactive	Strengthened fencing, UAVs, night vision, tech surveillance

---

Why UPA’s Handling Was Flawed

• Despite attacks like 26/11, where Pakistani handlers were caught live on tape, no military action was taken.
• Ajmal Kasab was captured, but Pakistan was never made to pay beyond diplomatic condemnation.
• UPA leaders spent more energy pushing the “Saffron Terror” narrative, shifting attention from the real threat — Pakistani jihadist groups.
• The Samjhauta Express blast, originally linked to Pakistan, was controversially reframed as a “Hindu terror” case despite serious doubts.

---

Modi’s Approach: Retaliate, Isolate, Secure

• Post-Uri, Surgical Strikes across the Line of Control marked a new doctrine — “we will respond.”
• After Pulwama, the Balakot airstrikes sent Indian jets deep into Pakistan, targeting a JeM terror facility.
• India also succeeded in getting Masood Azhar designated as a global terrorist and placed Pakistan on the FATF grey list.
• Operation Sindoor was one of the boldest operation which India has ever done. By taking our 9 terror hubs and 11 pakistan airfields , Modi showed that rule of the game has change

---

Conclusion: Who Failed India on Terrorism?

When critics target Prime Minister Modi for “failing” on terrorism, they conveniently forget the blood-soaked legacy of UPA, where over 900 Indians died due to Pakistan-sponsored terror — and India did nothing in response.

The Modi government’s firm stance, military retaliation, and nationalistic clarity have proven far more effective in safeguarding Indian lives and dignity. Any fair, fact-based evaluation must conclude: Criticizing Modi while excusing UPA’s appeasement and paralysis is the height of hypocrisy.

---