Who Was Mahmud Begada?
Mahmud Begada: The Bigot Ruler of Gujarat
Among the rulers of medieval India, Mahmud Begada stands out not only for his military conquests and architectural legacy but also for his notoriety as a religious bigot. His reign (1458–1511 CE) as Sultan of Gujarat is often hailed in courtly Persian chronicles for strength and expansionism, but a closer look at his policies reveals a darker side marked by sectarianism, religious persecution, and intolerance toward non-Muslim communities, particularly Hindus and Jains.
The Rise to Power
Mahmud Begada was born into the Muzaffarid dynasty of Gujarat, the grandson of Ahmad Shah I—the founder of Ahmedabad. He ascended the throne at a young age and soon established himself as an aggressive and ambitious ruler. He earned the title “Begada,” which means “conqueror of two forts,” referring to his victories over Girnar (Junagadh) and Champaner. While these conquests boosted his prestige, they also exposed his deep-seated religious fanaticism.
Bigotry Disguised as Statecraft
At a time when rulers like Rana Kumbha of Mewar were upholding dharmic values of tolerance and inclusion, Mahmud Begada chose the path of religious supremacy. Under his rule, Islamic orthodoxy became state policy. He actively promoted Islamic law (Sharia) as the legal foundation of the Sultanate and marginalized indigenous traditions and practices.
He enforced jizya (a tax on non-Muslims), which was not just an economic burden but also a symbol of second-class citizenship for Hindus and Jains. The jizya system, inherited from the Delhi Sultanate, was implemented with renewed vigor during Begada’s rule to coerce conversions and reinforce Muslim superiority.
Persecution of Hindus and Jains
Mahmud Begada’s military conquests were often followed by the destruction of temples and shrines, and the forcible conversion of local populations. In his campaign against Junagadh, he targeted the revered Hindu and Jain temples on Mount Girnar. The temple complexes were looted, desecrated, and either destroyed or converted into mosques. Such acts were not isolated incidents of war but deliberate acts of religious aggression.
The conquest of Champaner tells a similar story. After defeating the Rajput ruler Patai Rawal, Begada reportedly converted the city’s sacred spaces and compelled parts of the local population to embrace Islam. Jain sources from the time lament the destruction of temples, banning of religious festivals, and harassment of monks and pilgrims. Entire Jain communities were said to have migrated out of Gujarat to escape his oppressive rule.
Suppression of Religious Freedom
Begada’s bigotry extended beyond military actions. He actively enforced religious censorship and curtailed the public expression of non-Islamic faiths. Idols were banned, public processions were discouraged, and the building of new temples was prohibited unless special (and rarely granted) permission was obtained. This stifled the cultural and spiritual life of the native population.
Even food habits became targets of his religious intolerance. Jain texts recount how Begada imposed restrictions on vegetarian diets and ridiculed the Jain principle of ahimsa. At one point, the Jain community appealed to the Sultan to allow them to practice their religious rites without fear, but the requests were often ignored or only partially granted under duress.
An Administrator or a Tyrant?
Some historians describe Mahmud Begada as a capable administrator because he improved trade, developed the city of Champaner, and strengthened fortifications. However, a ruler’s greatness cannot be measured by stone walls and wealth alone. A truly great administrator uplifts all his subjects, not just those of his own religion.
Begada’s administration was exclusionary, favoring Muslim elites while alienating large sections of the population. His bigotry created social divisions and instilled fear among non-Muslim communities. His harsh punishments and religious zeal made his court unwelcoming to cultural diversity—a stark contrast to inclusive rulers like Akbar or even local Rajput kings of the time.
Glorification in Persian Chronicles
Why then is Mahmud Begada still celebrated in some circles? Much of the glorification comes from Persian court historians and chroniclers who viewed his expansion of Islam as a civilizational victory. To them, destruction of temples was a symbol of triumph over “idolatry.” These texts often whitewashed his atrocities, presenting them as necessary steps to enforce divine order.
But modern secular analysis demands that we go beyond such one-sided glorification. We must judge rulers not only by their conquests but also by their values—and Mahmud Begada fails that test miserably.
The Alternative Vision: Rule Like Ram
In Indian tradition, the ideal ruler is Ram, the upholder of dharma, justice, and equality. Ram ruled over people of all castes and creeds, and upheld the dignity of every citizen. A true ruler doesn’t discriminate based on faith or force anyone to abandon their spiritual path.
By contrast, Mahmud Begada represents a ruler who ruled through fear, imposition, and religious arrogance. His legacy may be preserved in stone structures and forts, but in the hearts of those who suffered under his rule, he remains a symbol of oppression and religious bigotry.
Conclusion
Mahmud Begada may have expanded the borders of the Gujarat Sultanate, but he did so at the cost of Gujarat’s spiritual and cultural harmony. He alienated and oppressed millions of his own people simply because they followed a different faith. His rule was a period of religious darkness for the non-Muslim population of Gujarat.
History must remember Mahmud Begada not as a hero of conquest but as a bigoted monarch whose reign stands in opposition to the ideals of secularism, pluralism, and tolerance. In an age when we seek to build inclusive societies, his legacy serves as a cautionary tale of what happens when rulers abandon justice in the pursuit of religious domination.
Comments are closed.